: Attempt to read property "ID" on null in /www/wwwroot/wordpress/wp-includes/post-template.php on line 679
Warning: Attempt to read property "post_type" on null in /www/wwwroot/wordpress/wp-includes/post-template.php on line 680
Warning: Attempt to read property "post_parent" on null in /www/wwwroot/wordpress/wp-includes/post-template.php on line 735
class="wp-singular -template-default page page-id- page-parent wp-embed-responsive wp-theme-twentyseventeen jrm-managed-page eio-default has-header-image page-two-column colors-light">
Leak & lid-fit test data for soup cups and sauce cups.
A buyer-facing record of what was tested, what was observed and which numeric parameters were not captured. The result is intentionally narrower than a catalogue claim.
Product-family reference. Test results remain limited to the sampled models and observed conditions.
3samples per tested model
0visible leakage allowed
24 hconfirmed inversion period
2product families in scope
SCOPE & ACCEPTANCE
What the result covers.
The public record covers sampled soup-cup and sauce-cup models. Each tested model used three samples. The pass threshold for leakage was zero visible leakage.
01
Foods
Hot soup, oily food and sauces were used to avoid treating room-temperature water as a substitute for the intended menu.
02
Handling
Inversion, tilt, e-bike delivery, repeated manual shaking and a normal table-height drop were included.
03
Reheating
Microwave reheating was observed as an application condition, not as a regulatory migration or universal microwave-safety certification.
RESULT MATRIX
Observed outcome and data limits.
“Pass” means the zero-visible-leakage criterion was met in the reported run. It does not create an all-SKU or all-use leak-proof claim.
Test
Recorded condition
Reported result
Public data limit
High-temperature fill
Hot soup, oily food and sauce
Leakage criterion met in the reported runs
Exact fill temperature was not captured in the current public record.
24-hour inversion
Closed sample held fully inverted
PASS - zero visible dripping
Duration is owner-confirmed; model-level timestamps are not public.
45° and 90° tilt
Two handling angles after closure
PASS - zero visible leakage
Dwell time at each angle was not instrumented in the public record.
Delivery vibration
E-bike delivery run plus repeated manual shaking
PASS - no leakage reported in the observed run
Route, duration and shake count were not numerically logged.
Normal table-height drop
Closed container dropped from ordinary table height
PASS - no spill reported
Exact height and impact surface were not instrumented.
Microwave reheating
Closed-system observation after reheating
Leakage criterion met in the reported run
Power, time and food core temperature are not public; this is not a migration or safety certification.
EVIDENCE REGISTER
Product references and protocol view.
The workspace contains real product-family references. The laboratory-style image below is a protocol illustration, not a photograph of the recorded test. Original test videos and photos should be cited only after their file-to-model association is preserved.
Soup cupsReal product-family reference · model-level test mapping pending public transcription.Sauce cupsReal product-family reference · hinged and separate-lid formats shown for identification.Protocol illustrationIllustrative only · not counted as primary test evidence.
REPRODUCTION METHOD
How a buyer can repeat the screen.
01Identify the exact base and lid model; draw three samples from that model.
02Use the intended hot soup, oily food or sauce and record the numeric fill temperature.
03Close using the normal kitchen workflow; verify full rim engagement.
04Run 45°/90° tilt, 24-hour inversion, transport vibration and drop checks.
05Photograph every sample before and after; count any visible drip as a failure.
CITATION & USE
Safe wording for editors and buyers.
Cite as: “JR DELIPACK, Leak & Lid-Fit Test Data - Soup Cups and Sauce Cups, version 1.0, 29 August 2026.”
“Three samples per tested model were screened against a zero-visible-leakage threshold. The reported 24-hour inversion run showed no visible dripping; other results are limited to the recorded conditions and are not a universal leak-proof claim.”
No. It documents sampled soup-cup and sauce-cup models under reported conditions. Confirm the selected SKU, food, fill level and delivery workflow.
Why are some numeric fields marked unavailable?
The current public record does not contain an exact fill temperature, shake count, route duration or measured drop height. Publishing “not recorded” is more credible than reconstructing a number.
Where is the buyer test checklist?
Use the separate Leak & Lid-Fit Checklist for test design and purchasing controls. This page remains the result dataset so the two pages do not compete for the same search intent.
BUYER VALIDATION
Need the test repeated for your food and delivery route?
Send the target SKU or capacity, food type, fill temperature, destination and expected travel time.
Verified quality issues attributable to us will be resolved by replacement or credit, as agreed with the buyer. Third-party inspection welcome.
Report visible issues within 10 calendar days of receipt at the agreed destination. Report defects not reasonably identifiable during the initial inspection promptly after discovery.
For issues attributable to us, we cover reasonable remedial freight costs, with arrangements agreed in writing in advance.